Editorials, Everything Else — June 4, 2013 at 3:00 pm



Nicolas Cage Elisabeth Shue Leaving Las VegasDo you remember a time when Nicolas Cage was not a caricature? Think hard.  I know you can do it.  You might have to scroll back through some of Cage’s screen credits on IMDb to refresh your memory, but there was indeed a time – and really it was not THAT long ago – when Cage was actually, kind of, maybe … a good actor.  The guy won an Oscar, after all.  While that is not a guarantor of greatness, Cage actually deserved that win for Leaving Las Vegas.

And before that? I present to you Rumble Fish, Raising Arizona, Moonstruck, Peggy Sue Got Married … hell, there’s a lot to be said even for the sappy comedies like It Could Happen To You and Guarding Tess.  The point is: Cage was a pretty good actor.  He had some turkeys mixed in, including the entirely confusing Vampire’s Kiss, most famous for his remarkable recitation of the alphabet, but those were often the exceptions rather than the rule.  In his post-Oscar career, he was in Adaptation, The Rock, Lord of War, The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans.  He did some good movies.  He did some enjoyable action flicks – I still dig Con Air, Face/Off and Gone In 60 Seconds.  He gave good performances in which he was not 100% batshit crazy.

So what the hell happened to Nicolas Cage? Cage was always one of those actors who probably needed to be reined in by his director (again: Vampire’s Kiss).  He has a tendency to ham it up like pigs are going extinct.  But when he is reined in – or when his craziness is well-directed – he can be charming, funny, intense without bringing the crazy.  Raising Arizona could have been crazy-Cage, but instead it was just a great Coen Brothers film and Cage fit it perfectly.  It saddens me, then, that his name has become a by-word for badness.nicolas-cage

The guy brought it on himself, of course.  I think it all began with the National Treasure franchise, but there were the seeds of it in The Rock and Con Air.  Those crazy eyes, that freaky grin, that intense, mad acting style right out of a pantomime.  The Wicker Man remake remains one of the most WTF films in existence, in a close running with Battlefield: Earth.  But Cage has now reached the point where he pretty much only has to attach his name to any film and we immediately think that it’s a massive pile of WTF.  The problem is we’re usually right.

Some, but by no means all, of Cage’s problems can be blamed on the financial difficulties he got into awhile back.  It appears that he pretty much took anything that would get him a paycheck, and it shows.  But unlike Michael Caine, who also appeared in some truly terrible motion pictures over the year with the sole goal of making money, Cage has failed to retain any kind of thespian status.  Instead he’s become a joke.

This has happened to other actors, though very often as a result of personal problems (Mel Gibson) or indulgence in crazy belief systems (Tom Cruise, John Travolta, and Will Smith is beginning to push it).  Cage, as far as I can tell, is not wallowing in badness because he can’t get any other work, or because he’s wondering what would Xenu do.  He’s simply saying yes to every movie he’s offered.  Some of those movies, like Bad Lieutenant, are brilliant, while others are just mind-numbingly terrible.

cage-wicker-man1It’s a terrible thing when good actors go bad.  Some of them, like Nicky, do it because they need the money; others do it because they have managed to jam their heads so far up their own asses that they can no longer see the light.  Success did in Marlon Brando, who came to believe at that he was a great philosophical light.  Richard Burton always thought of himself as a writer – and if his letters to Liz Taylor were any indication, he most certainly was not.  Johnny Depp is a modern-day actor who has slowly begun descending to the dark side, turning to more of a caricature of himself than the proper actor that he’s always been.  I have my worries about Robert Downey Jr. Actors are always at their best when they accept the fact that they are actors and not philosophers, writers or artists.  If they value their profession and value what they produce, they can go far and remain likable.  They also seem to wind up giving better performances, even in bad films.

I hold out hope for Nic Cage, despite the fact that he has five films in pre-production (according to IMDb), including Left Behind and National Treasure 3. I still think he’s capable of making a good movie or two, simply because he doesn’t appear to have gone the way of Will Smith or Brando.  He doesn’t believe that he’s better than his profession.  In some ways, I wonder if he doesn’t think that he’s actually worth less than he is.  This is a guy capable of much more than punching women and screaming about bees.  He just needs to be reminded of that.


  • But I love crazy Cage.

  • I’m still here!

  • Enjoyed Gone in 60 Seconds and just rewatched Moonstruck (one of the pre-Oscar films you mentioned) recently where everyone in the film is good and the ensemble is fun (Cher wouldn’t do the film without him being her opposite, and the film is so much better with him in it). Nice nod to Cage the actor who’s great when he makes an appearance. 😉

  • [Hi, Lauren. Saw this goodie on the net. Shocked?]

    Obama Supports a Rapture Book !

    Sixty million copies of “Left Behind” books have set new sales records. But Barack Obama quietly supports a different “Rapture” book, one that those mass-marketers hate!
    As evangelicals know, the Left-Behind-promoted “Rapture to heaven” is an imminent, secret coming of Christ conveniently occurring before the approaching “Tribulation” (a.k.a. Antichrist’s global reign of terror) so that “genuine” Christians will be safely in heaven before the Book of Revelation’s disasters begin. And they’re constantly told that their escapist “Pre-Tribulation Rapture” (hereafter: PTR) is Biblical and 2000 years old.
    Aware that no official theology or organized church before 1830 had ever taught the PTR, one historian began focusing years ago on Britain and various individuals that had been suggested as possible originators of the PTR.
    Unlike other prophecy researchers, he did on-site research throughout Britain and laboriously went through hard-to-locate works of all of those British writers to find out who indeed was first to use words and phrases such as “rapture,” “imminent,” “coming for,” “coming with,” “Antichrist,” etc. He was shocked to discover that a young Scottish woman was the actual PTR originator in 1830, that London preacher Edward Irving obtained it from her, and that John Darby (long assumed to be the “father” of the system springing from the PTR) wasn’t original on any important aspect of Bible prophecy!
    Wondering how Obama is involved in all this? Not a few see him as either the Antichrist or someone who’s preparing the way for that global dictator.
    So in a sense Obama’s anti-Christian and anti-American strategy has been giving support to the now-growing anti-PTR view – the followers of which have learned about the PTR’s bizarre, 183-year-old, covered up history and are now prepping to survive during Antichrist’s 3.5-year reign!
    The nonfiction book Obama actually supports (without realizing it) is “The Rapture Plot” by journalist/historian Dave MacPherson. For a taste of his original research Google “Famous Rapture Watchers,” “Pretrib Rapture Secrets,” “Pretrib Rapture Politics,” “Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty” and “Scholars Weigh My Research.”
    Since MacPherson is into activism as much as academics, young persons (who insist on facts and not opinions) appreciate his name-naming, tell-all approach.
    To get his unique, highly endorsed book “The Rapture Plot,” call 800.643.4645.

  • I have to say, what a poorly written piece this is! You are contradicting yourself throughout this article. Saying that Nicholas Cage has done a lote of bad roles, but then again there are soms movies (a.e. Bad Lieutenant) where he excelles. As if there isn’t an actor who accepts bad roles? Every actor has made bad decisions for different reasons. You never know how a movie turns out. The script can be great, but if you have the wrong director, budget etc.. I am not trying to defend Nicholas Cage, but your reaction strikes me like you haven’t made up your mind about him. How can you judge the movies someone makes when you don;t know the reason why he accepts them in the first place?
    I still like the guy, even though not all his flicks are great.
    With kind regards,

Leave a Reply

— required *

— required *